Free card game developed by CILMAR staff, adapted from noted interculturalist Bruce LaBrack's "What's Up With Culture" (open source) materials. As a result of this activity, participants will be able to: 1. Distinguish between three dimensions of human behavior (universal, cultural, and personal). 2. Identify the dangers of inaccurately identifying the motivations for behavior. 3. Apply this analytical skill to authentic relationships and interactions. Downloads include a lesson plan and the quiz cards.

Board game designed by a talented creative team of First Nations women. Currently available only in a 4-game or 8-game set with teaching notes, designed for K-12 schools or school districts."At-home" edition was said to be "in the works" as of mid-December 2021. Team also offers a "Decolonizing Activity Book" and other inclusion education materials & workshops. 4-game kit listed as costing $280 as of 4-29-2022.  Activity book listed as $8.00.

Board game designed to help players practice the skills of curiosity, openness and self-awareness. Website provides a teacher-student guide & also a virtual version of the physical game.  Cost listed at $65.00. The game is designed for use with learners of US high school age (approx. 15 years old) and above.

Just what the title says.

This document lists the instruments cited in the Smackdown video.  Note that in order to open the HubICL "curation card" about each instrument, you'll need to be logged into a HubICL account.

This assessment measures: 1. Emotions as possible barriers to effective language learning. 2. Emotional baggage that is brought to language learning situations. 

This cross-culturally validated, free, 14-question survey instrument "... was developed to measure individual differences in a stable sense of interdependence and connectedness with nature."  As such, it relates to capacity for mindfulness and emotional resilience.

This free, research-validated 10 question survey instrument measures the intensity of a person's social need to belong.

This 15-question, free & research-validated instrument measures feeling of social interaction anxiety, as opposed to patterns of behavior that might arise from social anxiety.

Many of the methods suggested for becoming more interculturally competent rely heavily on the idea that there must be direct person-to-person interaction (whether physical or virtual), in order for skills to improve.  This can be anxiety-causing for some individuals; thus using this instrument paired with a debrief may be helpful for more introverted learners. 

This assessment measures: 1. How participants feel about the pace & focus of a learning activity. 2. Other possibilities participants imagine that might feel more comfortable.

Each individual online assessment measures the participant's implicit attitudes, stereotypes, and biases related to a specific phenomenon or identity characteristic.  Test options include attitudes/biases as regards skin tone, disability/ability, mental health status, transgender status, sexuality, race, ethnicity, weight, age & religion.  There are 15 tests available.

This free assessment, created by a diverse global team of over 100 experts, measures: 1. The current state of diversity, equity, and inclusion within an organization. 2. Progress in managing diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts. 3. Feelings of trust, acceptance, and physical/psychological safety. 4. Short and long-term goals for an organization.  As such, it is not so much a measure of learning as a measure of the climate for learning. As of this writing (in late 2021), the instrument is available in English, French, Spanish & Portuguese.

This assessment measures: 1. The extent to which the following elements of a course foster diversity and inclusion: purpose/goals, content, foundations/perspectives, learners, instructors, pedagogy, environment, assessment/evaluation, and adjustment.

Created by Dr. Chien-tsung Lu, of Purdue's School of Aviation and Transportation Technology, in response to an Intercultural Pedagogy challenge, this instrument assesses the learner's self-described stance on Hofstede's cultural value dimensions, such as Power Distance, Uncertainty Avoidance, etc. Instructions for how to facilitate learning from this formative tool are also provided.

Included as a link from an article published in Inside Higher Education, this 4 question open-text assessment,intended to be used anonymously can yield rich qualitative data about inclusivity in the classroom, from the students' perspectives.  The article itself is also thick with good self-education suggestions from the group Learned Scientists for Racial Justice.  We highly recommend both resources!

Created by one of the world's foremost social psychology theorists, Dr. Mark Leary, this validated 10 question open-source survey instrument measures the degree to which an individual adheres to a belief that ".. everything that exists is part of some fundamental entity,substance, or process." Sense of oneness is related to universalism (see also the Miville-Guzman Universality-Diversity Scale) , to many religious belief systems and, often, to openness to mystical and/or transformative experiences.

The AEM-Cube® is a three-dimensional development instrument that maps the talents and challenges of individuals, teams, and organizations. It is available in multiple languages and has been implemented by more than 2500 organizations worldwide for various purposes, including recruitment, career coaching, team building, leadership, and innovation programs. 

The AEM-Cube® examines three key dimensions of adaptation: Attachment, Exploration and Managing Complexity.

Even folks with Ph.D's and lots of familiarity with experiential learning can be skittish about using rubrics to make sense of authentic artifacts of reflective learning. This explanation is the simplest and clearest we've yet seen about how to code qualitative data.  Using a rubric is a type of deductive coding, so, to get more comfortable with it, all you really need to read is the part of this essay on "Deductive Coding 101."  But the advice on keeping things simple is excellent, too.

Funded by an Alaska Native Education grant, this Culture in the Classroom resource defines 5 standards for culturally responsive teaching, with indicators and rubrics of increasing proficiency!  Although growing out of K-12 education, it also has broad applicability to the higher education classroom and would align well with Dr. Diatta-Holgate's work, mentioned earlier in this collection.

Culturally responsive teaching, as defined by expert Zaretta Hammond, in her book Culturally Responsive Teaching and the Brain, is one of the most impactful tools for empowering students to find their way out of what are commonly known as "achievement gaps." Culturally responsive teaching (CRT) attempts to bridge the gap between teacher and student by helping the teacher understand the cultural nuances that may cause a relationship to break down—which ultimately causes student achievement to break down as well.