This instrument is designed to measure openness, self-awareness, lack of ego, supportive-ness and capacity for self-critique. Questions can be found on page 61 of the attached article. Note that this instrumentwas designed for use in clinical psychology contexts; for the academic advising initiative, the team changed the word "client" to the word "student."  The Purdue study is only using the questions which measure openness.

Citation: Gonzalez, E., Sperandio, K. R., Mullen, P. R., & Tuazon, V. E. (2021). Development and initial testing of the Multidimensional Cultural Humility Scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 54(1), 56-70.

The ATIBI was designed to measure the attitudes of health professional and students to instruction about implicit bias. It measures: [1] the degree to which an individual values implicit bias instruction, [2] acceptance of implicit bias in oneself, [3] self-awareness & perceived self-efficacy, [4] recognition of the importance of implicit bias instruction, and [5] acceptance of the impact of implicit bias instruction on clinical care.

Citation:

Intercultural and inter-ethnic communication apprehension is defined as anxiety about communicating across either cultural or ethnic difference. Full question set for both instruments is included in this 1997 instrument.

Citation:

This assessment measures: 1. Intellectual empathy, empathetic emotions and the communication between the two. 2. Empathetic feelings and expression; empathetic perspective-taking; acceptance of cultural differences; and empathetic awareness. CAUTION: Some practitioners feel that this instrument, as written centers "whiteness" and privilege, for that reason, it can be an excellent tool for some learners and a harmful tool for others*. We encourage you to read the questions carefully and to think about your learner audience before using this instrument.

Citation: Wang, Y. W., Davidson, M. M., Yakushko, O. F., Savoy, H. B., Tan, J. A., & Bleier, J. K. (2003). The scale of ethnocultural empathy: Development, validation, and reliability. Journal of counseling psychology, 50(2), 221.

*A similar tool which may be of interest if the SEE seems inappropriate for your learner group is the Generalized Ethnocentrism Scale (GENE), developed and validated by Neulip and McCroskey in 1997. [http://www.jamescmccroskey.com/publications/172.pdf]

This instrument was developed to measure capacity for self-regulated learning (also called life-long learning) and reflection among medical students. It measures Insight, Need for Reflection, Intention for Reflection and Engagement in Reflection.

Citation: